Bench 80 kg for 5 reps - what is your true max? Three proven formulas (Epley, Brzycki, Lombardi) estimate your 1RM and generate a full training plan from 50% to 95% intensity.
One rep max from 12 reps
Bench 80 kg for 5 reps - what is your true max? Three proven formulas (Epley, Brzycki, Lombardi) estimate your 1RM and generate a full training plan from 50% to 95% intensity.
The 12 setting works from different assumptions than the ones next to it. The estimate is tightest between three and six reps, and drifts badly once a set runs past ten because endurance starts to dominate. This page opens the calculator with 12 already selected, so only the remaining fields are left to fill in. Replace the example values and recalculate to see how far the result moves.
Parameters
Enter data for calculations
💡 Fill in all required fields to unlock the calculate button
Your heaviest single without actually lifting it
Testing a true one-rep max puts enormous stress on joints, connective tissue and the central nervous system. The smarter approach: lift a submaximal weight for multiple reps and let mathematics extrapolate your ceiling. This calculator runs your numbers through three peer-reviewed formulas - Epley, Brzycki and Lombardi - and averages the results to minimize single-formula bias. It then generates a complete percentage-based training plan from 50% warmup to 95% max attempts.
Epley: 93.3 kg | Brzycki: 90.0 kg | Lombardi: 93.7 kg
Average 1RM: 92.3 kg | Your 80% training load: 73.9 kg
How to use this calculator - step by step
- Weight lifted (kg) - enter the weight you successfully completed in your last set. This should be a weight you moved with proper form. Range: 5-500 kg.
- Repetitions - the number of clean reps you performed to muscular failure (or near failure). Range: 1-20. Fewer reps produce a more accurate 1RM estimate.
- Read your results - three 1RM estimates, their average, a spread indicator showing how much the formulas agree, and a full training plan with weights for every intensity zone from warmup to max attempts.
The three formulas compared
| Formula | Equation | Best for | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epley | W x (1 + reps/30) | General use, CrossFit | Best at 3-10 reps |
| Brzycki | W x 36/(37 - reps) | 4-10 rep range | More conservative |
| Lombardi | W x reps^0.10 | Low rep range (1-5) | Best for heavy singles |
Training zones by percentage of 1RM
| % of 1RM | Training goal | Reps | Rest between sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50-60% | Warmup, technique | 12-15 | 60-90 seconds |
| 65-75% | Hypertrophy (muscle growth) | 8-12 | 90-120 seconds |
| 80-85% | Strength | 3-6 | 2-4 minutes |
| 90-100% | Power, peaking | 1-3 | 3-5 minutes |
Practical examples
Weight: 80 kg, Reps: 5. Epley: 93.3 kg, Brzycki: 90.0 kg, Lombardi: 93.7 kg. Average: 92.3 kg. Spread: 4.0% - reliable estimate.
Weight: 120 kg, Reps: 3. Epley: 132.0 kg, Brzycki: 127.1 kg, Lombardi: 134.2 kg. Average: 131.1 kg. Spread: 5.4%. Your 80% training load = 104.9 kg.
Weight: 180 kg, Reps: 1. All three formulas return 180.0 kg. Spread: 0%. With 1 rep, the lifted weight IS your 1RM.
Weight: 40 kg, Reps: 12. Epley: 56.0 kg, Brzycki: 57.6 kg, Lombardi: 50.8 kg. Average: 54.8 kg. Spread: 12.4% - wide divergence. Consider retesting with fewer reps.
Average 1RM: 100 kg. Warmup: 50 kg (50%). Hypertrophy: 70-75 kg (70-75%). Strength: 80-85 kg (80-85%). Power: 90-95 kg (90-95%).
FAQ
Related tools
BMR & TDEE Calculator
Find your daily calorie needs to support strength training and recovery - Open calculator
Body Fat Calculator
Estimate your body fat percentage with the U.S. Navy method - know your composition before programming - Open calculator
WHR Calculator
Check your waist-to-hip ratio and cardiovascular risk assessment - Open calculator
BMI Calculator
Quick Body Mass Index check - useful as a baseline, but 1RM-focused lifters should rely on body fat % instead - Open calculator
Ideal Weight Calculator
Find your target weight range from three clinical formulas - Open calculator
See also
Calculator verified by the LiczGrupa.pl team
Content, formulas and results have been reviewed for accuracy and relevance by our team of specialists.

Reviewed by: Natalia Skrzek