How fast is 400 watts on a bike on a flat road?

    Estimate the watts behind your riding speed without a power meter, or the speed your watts buy. Weight, grade, wind, position, tires and air all count, split by force.

    The calculator below is set to a steady 400 W at the pedals for a 165 lb rider on a 20 lb road bike, hands on the hoods, ordinary road tires, a flat road with no wind, 68 °F at sea level. Press Calculate for the speed in mph, the 10-mile and 40K times and the speed in three other positions. Type your own weight, grade or wind and the speed follows.

    Parameters

    Enter data for calculations

    Speed to watts, or watts to speed

    Speed, weight, height and temperature

    Your weight without the bike

    Bike, bottles, bags, shoes, helmet

    Plus uphill, minus downhill, empty = flat

    Plus headwind, minus tailwind, empty = none

    Sets the air resistance (CdA)

    Sets the rolling resistance (Crr)

    Empty = 68 °F (20 °C)

    Empty = sea level

    Form progress0 / 6 fields

    💡 Fill in all required fields to unlock the calculate button

    Watts for any speed, and the speed your watts buy

    A 165 lb rider on a 20 lb road bike needs about 136 W to hold 18 mph on a flat road with hands on the hoods. Three quarters of that goes into pushing air. This cycling power calculator works out that number for your own weight, bike, position, tires, grade, wind and air, splits it into the forces that eat it, and runs the other way too: type the watts you can hold and it returns your speed, your 10-mile and 40K times, and your climbing rate on a hill.

    No power meter needed. The speed from a bike computer or a GPS watch is enough. Pick a stretch where the grade and the wind stayed about the same, and the calculator estimates the watts that speed took.

    A ride worked out in six steps

    The example below follows the form from top to bottom. Each step says what to type and what the choice changes.

    1. Choose the direction - "I know my speed" returns watts; "I know my watts" returns speed. Riders without a power meter start with the first. Take the average speed of one segment, not the whole ride, because stops and hills blur it.
    2. Choose US or metric units - US units ask for mph, pounds, feet and °F. The result echoes the same units and adds kilograms where they matter, since watts per kilogram is the figure every training plan quotes.
    3. Type both weights - your body weight, then the bike with everything on it: bottles, saddle bag, lights, shoes and helmet. A carbon road bike usually weighs 15 to 20 lb ready to ride, an aluminum gravel bike 20 to 25 lb, a loaded commuter 30 lb or more. In the example: 165 lb and 20 lb.
    4. Describe the road - the grade in percent, minus for a descent, and the wind along the road in mph, plus for a headwind and minus for a tailwind. A wind at 60 degrees to the road counts about half its speed. Leave both empty for a flat road on a still day.
    5. Pick a position and tires - the position sets CdA, the drag area of rider and bike: 0.40 sitting up on the tops, 0.33 on the hoods, 0.30 in the drops, 0.26 on aero bars. Tires set Crr, the rolling resistance coefficient: 0.003 for race tires on smooth asphalt, 0.004 for ordinary road tires, 0.0066 for touring tires. If you have measured values from an aero test or a roller test, choose "my own" and type them.
    6. Add the air if it was unusual - empty boxes mean 68 °F at sea level. Cold air is denser and costs more; thin air at altitude costs less. Then read the result: the watts or the speed at the top, the split into air, tires, climbing and drivetrain below, and a table with the same ride in the other three positions.

    Where 136 watts go on a flat road

    The calculator uses the road-cycling model published by James Martin and colleagues, who checked it against power meter readings and found the predicted and measured watts in close agreement (R² of 0.97, a standard error of about 3 W). It adds up four forces and divides by the efficiency of the chain and gears:

    • Air resistance grows with the square of the speed through the air, and the power needed to beat it with the cube of your speed on a still day. The drag area is CdA plus a small extra 0.0044 m² for the spinning wheels.
    • Rolling resistance is Crr times total weight, so its power cost grows only in step with speed.
    • Wheel bearings take a few watts at any normal speed.
    • Gravity is total weight times the sine of the climbing angle. It is zero on a flat road and helps on a descent.

    For the example ride that comes to 105 W of air resistance (77%), 28 W for tires and bearings (20%) and 3 W lost in the drivetrain, which the model treats as 97.7% efficient. Dropping from the hoods to aero bars saves 22 W at the same 18 mph; sitting up on the tops costs 22 W more.

    Watts on a flat road, 165 lb rider, 20 lb bike, road tires

    Position12 mph15 mph18 mph20 mph22 mph25 mph
    Tops, upright (0.40)57 W99 W158 W210 W272 W388 W
    Hoods (0.33)51 W86 W136 W179 W231 W327 W
    Drops (0.30)48 W80 W126 W166 W213 W302 W
    Aero bars (0.26)44 W73 W113 W148 W190 W267 W

    Read across a row and the cube law shows: going from 20 to 25 mph on the hoods takes 25% more speed and 83% more power (179 W to 327 W).

    Going the other way: what 100 to 300 watts are worth

    With a power meter, or with the watts a training plan prescribes, switch the direction and the calculator finds the speed by searching for the point where the four forces use up exactly your watts. The table uses the same rider and bike on a flat road with no wind.

    Flat-road speed for a steady power

    PowerTopsHoodsDropsAero bars
    100 W15.1 mph16.0 mph16.4 mph17.1 mph
    150 W17.6 mph18.7 mph19.2 mph20.1 mph
    200 W19.6 mph20.9 mph21.5 mph22.4 mph
    250 W21.3 mph22.7 mph23.3 mph24.4 mph
    300 W22.8 mph24.2 mph24.9 mph26.1 mph

    Doubling the power from 150 to 300 W on the hoods adds only 5.5 mph. The same 200 W rides a 40K in 1:11:31 on the hoods and 1:06:28 on aero bars, five minutes for a change of position alone. Position is free speed.

    On a climb, weight takes over from air

    As the road tilts up, speed drops and the air stops mattering. Gravity becomes the main cost, so every pound counts. The result adds VAM, the vertical meters climbed per hour (from the Italian term for average climbing speed), which riders use to compare climbs of different lengths.

    200 W on the hoods, 165 lb rider, 20 lb bike

    GradeSpeedShare for gravityVAM
    2%15.1 mph55%485 m/h (1,590 ft/h)
    4%10.7 mph79%687 m/h (2,254 ft/h)
    6%7.9 mph87%763 m/h (2,503 ft/h)
    8%6.2 mph91%795 m/h (2,607 ft/h)
    10%5.1 mph93%811 m/h (2,660 ft/h)

    On a 6% climb at 200 W, a bike 5 lb lighter lifts the speed from 7.9 to 8.1 mph, and losing 10 lb of body weight lifts it to 8.3 mph. On the flat at the same 200 W the lighter bike changes nothing you can see: the speed stays at 20.9 mph.

    Wind, tires and air: the smaller settings

    Wind

    18 mph into a 10 mph headwind takes 288 W, more than twice the still-air 136 W. With the same wind behind you it takes only 50 W. Hold 200 W instead and the speed swings from 15.1 mph into the wind to 27.5 mph with it.

    Tires

    At 18 mph race tires need 129 W, ordinary road tires 136 W and touring tires 153 W. The gap of 24 W is close to what dropping from the hoods to aero bars saves.

    Air

    The same 18 mph costs 142 W at 40 °F, 131 W at 95 °F and 117 W at 5,280 ft, the elevation of Denver. Thin air is why hour records are attempted at altitude.

    Before you trust the watts

    How accurate is a power estimate without a power meter?
    The physics is accurate; the inputs are the weak point. CdA is the largest unknown, because two riders on the hoods can differ by 0.05 m², which at 18 mph is a gap of about 16 W. Wind you did not notice is the second. So treat one estimate as approximate, pick calm days and steady segments, and average several of them rather than trusting one.
    Why does the result say 0 W on a descent?
    At 25 mph on a 5% descent gravity supplies more power than the air and tires take, so the bike accelerates without pedaling. The result says how large the surplus is (140 W for the example rider) instead of printing a negative power. On a gentler 3% descent the same speed needs a real 45 W.
    Is the result the same as the number on my power meter?
    It is the power at the pedals, which is what a crank or pedal power meter reports. A hub power meter sits after the chain and reads about 2% lower, the drivetrain loss shown in its own tile. A smart trainer also measures after the drivetrain.
    Does the model handle accelerating, cornering or drafting?
    No. It describes a steady speed on a straight road, which is why it asks for a segment rather than a whole ride. Riding in a group lowers the air resistance of the riders behind the leader considerably; to estimate that, type a smaller custom CdA.
    What is a good watts per kilogram figure?
    The 136 W of the example is 1.81 W/kg, an easy endurance pace for a fit rider. Sustained power over an hour is a separate question: it depends on fitness, not on the road, and is measured with a functional threshold power test.

    Related tools

    Power Zones Calculator

    Your seven training zones in watts, to know which zone a given speed rides in - See the calculator

    FTP Calculator

    Functional threshold power and W/kg from a 20-minute, ramp or 8-minute test - See the calculator

    Sweat Rate Calculator

    How much to drink on a long ride, from a weigh-in before and after - See the calculator

    Treadmill Calculator

    Indoor speed and incline as an outdoor running pace - See the calculator

    VDOT Calculator

    Training paces from a running race result - See the calculator

    Bike vs Car Calculator

    The cost and calories of a bike commute - See the calculator

    Average Speed Calculator

    Speed from distance and time for any ride - See the calculator

    Calories Burned Calculator

    Energy used by a ride from METs, time and body weight - See the calculator

    Calculator verified by the LiczGrupa.pl team

    Content, formulas and results have been reviewed for accuracy and relevance by our team of specialists.

    Patryk Matyjasik

    Reviewed by: Patryk Matyjasik